“despite”.
Ugh.
Friends, can we stop considering this a compliment? I had a waffle date/play date yesterday morning with another Mama and her boy. While we sipped coffees, I said I was the same age as another 30 year old we know. And she said: “You don’t look 30!”
And she meant it as a compliment.
I smiled and said “Thanks, but I’m really ok with being 30.”
Because I am 30 and I do look 30. I look like me at 30. By telling a woman she doesn’t look her age, we’re actually telling her that she doesn’t look what you expect that age to looks like. “Oh, you may be 30, but you’re still pretty. Weird.” 30 Rock dedicated a whole episode to this when Jenna tells a newspaper she’s 56. But really, she just looks good compared to the societally perceived norm for that age which is unattractive. We do the same when we say “Wow! Helen Mirren looks amazing at 67.”
So let’s not bring age into this. I look 30. I look like me at 30. I don’t know who else I’m supposed to look like at this age.
I know it’s considered a compliment. But let’s stop that.
Let’s just tell each other: “You look nice.”
Sorry to be a snarky B, but how is this woman married to Fitz?? Yes, she is insanely talented (or so IMBD leads me to believe), but like….Olivia Pope or this? Does not compute.
Should we not rejoice the men in Hollywood who marry love over attractive costars? Especially when we compare women who are 23 years in age apart? Should we not celebrate a 26-year-old Hollywood marriage? How can we women ever get a chance of being valued for our skills, intelligence, training when fellow women take us down for not being as good looking as their husbands? How will we ever be good enough if excelling at our passion instead of following the Hollywood starlet beauty and fitness regime still puts us at the whim of snark? And what are we teaching our kids when we say “I don’t understand how a woman who looks like this can be married to a man who looks like that”?
You guys, we have to be better than this.
Uruguay becomes the third Latin American country to legalize abortion, but there’s a catch.
(via)
President Obama’s policies aren’t working for women. We need a president who will make sure all women have the opportunity for a bright and prosperous future http://mi.tt/T0waZb
I’ll just leave this here…
This is Mavzuna Chorieva.
On Wednesday, the 19 year old became the first female Tajik athlete to win a medal for her country (only two others had been won before, in 2008). She took home the bronze medal in women’s lightweight boxing. In Tajikistan, it’s difficult for women to take part in combat sports, so Chorieva had very few competitors. She spent years disguising herself as a boy so she would have sparring partners.
Anne-Marie Slaughter for the Atlantic.
Joanne Bamberger, writer of Pundit Mom
Is it okay for me to be annoyed any time that people talk about “work-life balance” as some sort of special issue for women? It just casually and unreflectively captures so many bad assumptions about how families should be structured. Men also have families they should prioritize. Maybe they suck at balancing work and family—but they’re still supposed to do the job.
Presidents Obama, W. Bush, and Clinton all had younger children while serving as President. Why don’t we spend more time asking them about “work life balance”?
(via squashed)
When single dads equal the number of single moms, then we can say this is no longer a gender issue. More than a quarter of children in America are being raised by single parents. The 2009 American census told us that of those 13.7 million parents raising children single-handedly, 84% of them were mothers.
Now look at the paltry maternity benefits given to American women. Twelve weeks of job-protected leave that is unpaid is hardly a benefit. What if that mother wants to continue breast-feeding after her 12 weeks of leave? That means time at the office spent pumping bottles and longer hours spent at the office making up for that time pumping in the conference room. And when a breastfeeding (or bottle-feeding) mother gets up with her child two, three, four, five times a night, she’s still expected to be at work on time and producing the same amount of work as the man at the desk next to her, while she supposedly is paid less.
And then you factor in the responsibility weight of pregnancy and giving birth. I don’t know how women work up until their due date. Being 34+ weeks pregnant is the worst and then to factor in dragging my butt to an office? Oof.
There are also the societal pressures on mothers. Look at that Time cover. Look at the response it got. It wasn’t men who were crying foul. It was women. They were saying it was an exploitation of breastfeeding. It was ridiculous to imply that they weren’t “mom enough”. It was inciting “mommy wars”. Would Time magazine run an image of a father using an artificial breast on their cover? Would it get the same response? Probably not. It would probably get people coming back saying “Breastfeeding should be left to women!”
A man that has a few after-work drinks with the guys when he has a pair of small kids at home? Or spends every Saturday morning on the golf course blowing off steam? Totally cool with society. A woman who does the same? Not cool. Societal pressures play a factor in this too.
In 2010, 5 million women were stay-at-home moms. In the same year, stay-at-home dads numbered 154,000.
So yes, this is a gender issue.
Commercial Parody of the Day: “What about my right to choose to not have a choice?”
Kate Beckinsale, Judy Greer, and Andrea Savage take aim at Republicans’ War on Women with this satirical take on the debate over reproductive rights.
(Not Safe For Work, “Get in my vagina!”)
This is great.
(Source: thedailywhat)